08 May Supreme Court Decision About Threatening Crime
T.C SUPREME COURT 4.Sentencing Office Basis: 2015/21528 Decision: 2019/18081 Decision Date: 25.11.2019
SUPREME COURT DECISION
Court :Criminal Court of First Instance
Crime: threat
Verdict: acquittal
The sentence given by the Local Court was appealed, the file was discussed according to the duration of the application and the nature of the decision and the date of the crime:
Because there were no reasons for the denial of the appeal request, the work was moved to its merits,
According to the content of the minutes, documents and justification reflecting the trial process in which conscientious blood is formed, it is understood that acts of ill-treatment, injury were also carried out against the polytheist, but no cases were also filed from these acts, and law 5271 253 in terms of the crime of threat, taking into account that these acts occurred against the spouse. Article 3. in accordance with the paragraph, it was determined that the compromise could not be reached.,
The plaintiff (maktule of) have been unsettled by his wife gave 19.04.2013 bulky and a petition because, being threatened with death, had left his house with his wife and their consent to withstand the pressures, the relevant files that exist at the police station, a lawyer for a divorce stayed at the women’s shelter, the children of threats on the fear left when you get back home; this time the wife of the defendant, his family threatened, went to a friend’s house in the institution whereupon he met his wife, I decided to search the suspect’s grandfather, he heard the safety of life at stake, and therefore should be given to the spouse of information about belirttikde after that he wanted; and finally the plaintiff dated 15.01.2014 indictment was filed on the day the suspect’s wife murdered by 13.06.2014; in the case in which the defendant denied his guilt in his defense, but stated that he went to his mother-in-law’s house because the witness had left the House.; statements of the polytheists, the way the incident occurred, the polytheists mentioned the events that had previously been transferred to the police station, the polytheist (victim) had two children, settled in the women’s shelter and stayed there for a while, when he went to his mother’s house, the accused put pressure on his wife and mother, lost his address and tried to save his life by going elsewhere, all these mentioned and the issues contained in the file are evaluated together, as a result, the defendant who killed his wife and was sued for the crime of killing his wife committed the crime of threats against his mother and the victim (the victim), although it is fixed that he was acquitted on Written grounds,
As the reasons for the appeal of the illegal and participating …were seen in place, it was unanimously decided on 25/11/2019 to overturn the provision, to send the file to the main/sentencing court to be continued and concluded starting from the stage before the annulment of the trial.
No Comments