Supreme Court Decision About Slander Crime - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17507
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17507,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Supreme Court Decision About Slander Crime

07 Nov Supreme Court Decision About Slander Crime

Posted at 15:02h in General by
0 Likes

T.C.
Supreme
8. Criminal Division

Base No: 2018/7291
Decision No: 2018/10165
K. Date: 2.10.2018

Court : Criminal Court of First Instance
Crime : libel
Verdict: acquittal

As necessary, discussed and considered:

In order for the crime of libel to occur, it is necessary to attribute an illegal act to someone to ensure that an investigation and prosecution is initiated or an administrative sanction is imposed, even though he knows that he did not commit it by notifying or complaining to the competent authorities, in a concrete case; after the complainant complained to Bimer that the complainant was consciously separated from the Life Support Unit, the complainant complained that there were many cases of arrrest and eks in his seizures, the allegations against the participant were unfounded as a result of a preliminary examination by the hospital administration., in the face of determining that it is based on personal animosity, the defendant is acquitted on Written grounds, rather than a conviction for libel, consisting of subuta eren and its elements,
Contrary to the law, the appeals of the participating deputy were considered in place in this respect, so the provision is 8/1 of law 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be applied in accordance with article.nun 321. it was unanimously decided on 02.10.2018.

Tags:
, , , , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran