Seizure Of Social Media Account Passwords (msn, instagram,twitter,etc.) - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16566
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16566,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Seizure Of Social Media Account Passwords (msn, instagram,twitter,etc.)

Seizure Of Social Media Account Passwords (msn, instagram,twitter,etc.)

T.C.

SUPREME

CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT

2012/31216

2013/25978

1.11.2013

* Changing the password by entering the e-mail account (5237 S. According to the text responses from Microsoft and Tib regarding that the e – mail account belonging to the participant has been entered many times from the internet account belonging to the defendant’s father and the scope of the entire file.K. Md.Where the crime in 244/2 occurred)

* Preventing access by changing the password of the e-mail account (the defendant who obtained the password of the e-mail of the participant enters this address to change the password and prevents access to the e – mail of the participant-5237 P.K. Md.That He Should Be Sentenced Under 244/2)

* It crime (5237 S., which complies with the action of the defendant’s father’s internet account, which prevents access to the e – mail account of the participant by seizing the password and entering this address by changing the password.K. Md.That He Should Be Punished Under 244/2)

* Changing the password by entering the e – mail account (receiving text responses from Microsoft and Tib regarding the internet account belonging to the defendant’s father that the e – mail account belonging to the participant has been entered several times / denied access to the e-mail of the participant – 5237 P.K. Md.Where the crime in 244/2 occurred)

No. 5320. CMUK, which must be applied in accordance with the article.nun 321. in accordance with the clause (its dissolution), a unanimous decision was made on 01.11.2013.

Block, disrupt, destroy, or modify the system

Article 244 – (1) the person who obstructs or disrupts the functioning of an IT system shall be punished with a prison sentence of one to five years.

(2) the person who corrupts, destroys, changes or makes the data in an information system inaccessible, places the data in the system and sends the existing data to another location shall be sentenced to imprisonment of six months to three years.

(3) if these acts are committed on the IT system belonging to a bank or credit institution or a public institution or institution, the penalty shall be increased by half.

(4) in the event that a person’s wrongful benefit for himself or anyone else by committing the acts described in the preceding paragraphs does not constitute another crime, imprisonment of two to six years and a judicial fine of up to five thousand days shall be imposed.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran