Petition To Appeal The Decision Of Lack Of Jurisdiction - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
18402
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-18402,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Petition To Appeal The Decision Of Lack Of Jurisdiction

24 Apr Petition To Appeal The Decision Of Lack Of Jurisdiction

Posted at 23:09h in General by
0 Likes

… TO THE JUDGE OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

File: … / … E.

DEFENDANT :

Defense :

Crime: the crime of Information Theft.

Subject: our appeal of the decision to leave office.

INSTRUCTIONS :

1-) …/ …/ … in the history of paying that money belongs to the bank branch, waiting in front of the machine, previously taking money from the complainant card into the machine by compressing … …’s password under the pretext of helping the complainant’s debit card to make a jam after learning the complainant, by convincing you to leave after his departure, cut away the money from the complainant’s account and use the card for £ Informatics for the crime of theft of our client about attracting your court …/ … E. a public lawsuit has been filed with the numbered file.

2 -) in the trial conducted by your court …/ …/ … it was concluded that the discarded action constituted a crime of qualified fraud, not information theft, and the file was sent to the Criminal Court…, which is considered to be a duty officer by making a decision on non-duty.

3 -) The General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeal on sentencing, given in a similar event dated 26.02.2008 and 2008/11-17 E. 2008/38 K. by its numbered decision, it resolved the dispute of duties between the Criminal Court of First Instance and the Criminal Court of First Instance by removing the decision of the non-duties of the Criminal Court of First Instance.

4 -) taking into account the case law provision above; with the acceptance of our appeal to the decision on non-duty given by your court, it was necessary to apply to your court to proceed to the examination of the merits of the work.

Legal reasons: 5237 P. K. m. 142, 158, 5271 P. K. m. 5, 267, 268

Conclusion and claim : for the reasons explained above, we have filed in your court against our client …/ … E. we respectfully demand on behalf of our client that the decision to move to the basis of the work is accepted by our appeal to the decision of non-duty given in the numbered file. …/ …/ …

Defence Of The Accused

Lawyer

Tags:
, , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran