Obstruction Of Access As a Precautionary Measure Under The Law Of Civil Procedure (HMK) - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17273
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17273,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
Obstruction Of Access As a Precautionary Measure Under The Law Of Civil Procedure (HMK)
06 Jul Obstruction Of Access As a Precautionary Measure Under The Law Of Civil Procedure (HMK)
HMK 389. If the court is concerned that the right will be significantly difficult or completely impossible to obtain due to a change in the current situation, or that a disadvantage or serious harm will arise due to delay, an injunction decision may be issued by the court. People who claim that their personal rights have been violated in the content of the publication may also ask the law courts to issue an access prohibition order as a precautionary measure. However, there is a “moderation principle” that courts should consider when deciding whether to block access as an injunction. If many people are harmed in addition to their interests, which are protected by the applied measure, this decision is not restrained and no decision on access barriers should be made to that effect.
No Comments