Objection To The Expert Report - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
18681
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-18681,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Objection To The Expert Report

11 Jun Objection To The Expert Report

Posted at 18:16h in General by
0 Likes

… TO THE JUDGE OF THE COURT OF LAW;

File: … / … E.

CONTESTING

DEFENDANT :

TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER :

ADDRESS :

Deputy :

(Legal representatives of the parties, if any)

ADDRESS :

(Legal representatives of the parties, if any)

PLAINTIFF :

Address :

Deputy :

ADDRESS :

(Legal representatives of the parties, if any)

Subject: includes our objections to the expert report.

INSTRUCTIONS :

1 -) our objections to the expert report dated … / … / … submitted to the file in relation to the case file registered in the above-mentioned basis of your court are as follows:

2 -) as it will be remembered, this case was filed by the plaintiff in order to ensure the collection of recourse from our client of the payment he made to the insured due to the workplace insurance policy, which includes internal flood coverage. Our client is held liable as a tenant and for causing damage due to his own use.

3 -) in the said expert report, only the fact that the damage occurred was confirmed, the damage caused by the damage was satisfied with making a material calculation, taking into account market indicators.

4 -) however, the hose that causes damage by tearing over time is a constant production in the building and is a value of the building. Moreover, it is made of cheap material and not placed in accordance with technical data. Although these considerations were also highlighted in our dated response petition, the expert report referred to does not contain any findings or observations on these issues. So much so that when the accuracy of our claim is constant, law 818 No. 58. according to the article, “the property of a building or anything manufactured will be liable for the bad construction of that thing or for defects in its preservation”, the liability of our client cannot be mentioned.

5 -) for the reasons we tried to explain above, we object to the expert report in question.

Legal reasons: 6100 P. K. m. 281.

Conclusion and request : for the reasons we have tried to explain above, I request by proxy that with the acceptance of our objections to the dated expert report, the decision to conduct an expert review should be made again and in such a way as to cover the issues mentioned in our objections. …/…/…

Acting Defendant

Lawyer

Tags:
, , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran