Non-Enforcement Of Precautionary Foreclosure Due To Corona Virus - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16659
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16659,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Non-Enforcement Of Precautionary Foreclosure Due To Corona Virus

15 Apr Non-Enforcement Of Precautionary Foreclosure Due To Corona Virus

Posted at 15:57h in General by
0 Likes

Execution and non-execution of injunctive Lien
There has long been debate in the doctrine about the nature of injunctive relief. Indeed The Law Is General
In the 2008/12-25 basis 2008/3 decision of the board dated 23.1.2008 County3;
‘For this reason, injunctive relief is not an execution follow-up process, but rather an aid to the actual execution follow-up process.,
an institution of a protective nature that provides assurance and is capable of turning into a follow-up process of execution in person,
it is a kind of precautionary action applied before the execution proceedings or the lawsuit to be filed. Injunctive relief
the fact that the execution was not a follow-up process, the Supreme Court said of the General Assembly of the law, “is the first of the injunctive sequestration. 289. in the article
“16.02.2000 days and 2000/12-49 basis and 2000/94
Decision no.; again “injunctive foreclosure Turkish Commercial Code 662. cutting the statute of limitations
reasons listed among the nature of the follow-up request regarding the ” 22.06.1968 day and 1967/805
The basis is clearly stated in the Decree No. 1968/475.”
it is stated that the injunction is not an execution follow-up process. For this reason, there must be a resolution No. 2279
the party has clearly stated that it has stopped the follow-up proceedings as well as the injunctive relief proceedings. Also
we would like to point out that during this process, a precautionary lien decision can be requested and a precautionary lien decision can be made.
But the execution of the injunction is not possible.
3. Exceptions To Resolution 2279
In the resolution, execution follow-up for alimony receivables was excluded from the discontinued follow-up and operations. This
therefore, all kinds of alimony receivables can be continued. As a matter of fact, the execution is halted
considering the purpose of the decision, the exception of child support follow-up coincides with this decision
we believe that.

Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran