07 Nov Legal Nature Of Sharing Ideas And Thoughts On Social Media
Sharing thoughts and ideas through social media
In today’s age, with the increase in the use of social media, the formation of the crime of insults through social media has started to be more on the agenda. People share through social media to insult, slander and threats as they are able to commit the crime of social media platforms, sites, friends, or non-social media people on their comments and/or photos to be used in the processing of a crime without the consent of their owners can lead to.
As a result of any seizure and sharing of social media content by persons registered as friends on social media pages or unregistered third parties for any purpose without the consent of their owners, it becomes possible to sue on behalf of the person due to complaints made to judicial authorities.Cases in judicial authorities on this issue are usually considered as part of the crime of violation of the privacy of private life. Again, according to the status of the specific event, the nature of the crime changes and is considered as part of the crime of violation of freedom of communication or violation of the security of personal data.
As for the exchange of ideas and ideas made within the scope of the exercise of constitutional and legal rights:
1982 constitution, the first paragraph of Article 12 regulating the nature of fundamental rights and freedoms: “everyone, depending on his personality, inviolable, inalienable, irreplaceable fundamental rights and freedoms have.”provision,
The first paragraph of Article 20, which regulates the privacy of private life, states: “Everyone has the right to demand respect for his privacy and family life. The confidentiality of your personal life and family life cannot be touched.”provision,
Article 22 regulating freedom of communication: “(changed: 3.10.2001-4709/7 md.) Everyone has freedom of communication. Confidentiality of communication is essential.”provision,
Of the first paragraph of Article 24, which regulates freedom of religion and conscience: “everyone has freedom of conscience, religious belief and opinion.“the third paragraph with the provision ” no one can be forced to explain religious beliefs and beliefs to worship, ( … ); they cannot be condemned and accused of their religious beliefs and beliefs.”provision,
Article 25, which regulates freedom of thought and opinion: “everyone has freedom of thought and opinion.” provision and
Article 26, which regulates the freedom to explain and disseminate thought: “everyone has the right to explain and disseminate his thoughts and beliefs alone or collectively by words, letters, pictures or other means. This freedom also includes the freedom to receive or give news or ideas without the intervention of official authorities. ( … ) ” provision,
It has clearly and clearly regulated the rights and responsibilities granted to citizens.
Explanations will be based on, as political authority and/or public officials who represented the authority in relation to investigations, examinations or claims for criticism; even in opposition to political power, which did not constitute a crime the subject of ideas, thoughts and beliefs with the beliefs on social media sharing, social media shares appreciated in this direction, because of the fact of people legally and the indictment is not legally possible; on the contrary, it is believed that such personal rights and freedoms are guaranteed and protected by the Constitution and laws.
No Comments