IT IS NOT A CRIME TO RECORD THE FIGHT WITH A CAMERA AND SUBMIT IT TO THE INVESTIGATION FILE - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
19233
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-19233,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

IT IS NOT A CRIME TO RECORD THE FIGHT WITH A CAMERA AND SUBMIT IT TO THE INVESTIGATION FILE

17 Sep IT IS NOT A CRIME TO RECORD THE FIGHT WITH A CAMERA AND SUBMIT IT TO THE INVESTIGATION FILE

Posted at 15:10h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

12. Criminal Department

Base Number: 2017/5122

Decision Number: 2018/2516

“text of jurisprudence”

Court of First Instance: Criminal Court of First Instance
Crime : Violation of the privacy of private life
Verdict: Acquittal

The provision on the acquittal of the accused for violating the confidentiality of private life was considered necessary on appeal by the participant, examining the file:
According to the scope of the file; the defendant is the father of his estranged wife, their children who came to see the attendee’s home when the ensuing discussion with the camera to record and claimed to offer as evidence in the event the investigation file, the record is shared with the images obtained in a third person or persons and/or duplicating and distributing not put forward a claim relating to the defendant, the action of turning to him still in a state of no other way due to not being able to prove, while the evidence and ensure the preservation of the loss probability of the participant with the aim of proving action in action, due to the fact that he did not act with the consciousness of acting contrary to the law, there was no hit in the acceptance of the local court.
At the end of the trial, it was unanimously decided on 07.03.2018 that the decision on acquittal should be upheld in accordance with the request, rejecting the appeals of the participant that the defendant should be punished, since the act was accepted and appreciated by the court on the grounds that it was not defined as a crime in the law, and the verdict on acquittal was upheld unanimously on 07.03.2018.

Tags:
, , , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran