For The Inheritance Of Foreign Nationals, Which Court Gives The Certificate Of Inheritance? - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16367
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16367,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

For The Inheritance Of Foreign Nationals, Which Court Gives The Certificate Of Inheritance?

13 Mar For The Inheritance Of Foreign Nationals, Which Court Gives The Certificate Of Inheritance?

Posted at 00:54h in General by
0 Likes

T. C.
SUPREME COURT
20. LAW OFFICE
ESAS NO: 2017/10903
DECISION NO: 2018/95
DATE OF DECISION: 15.1.2018

In the case brought against the request of the certificate of inheritance, the decision of the Ministry of Justice and the B Magistrates’ Courts was issued separately after the decision of the regional courts of justice because the decision was made after the decision of the judicial courts. and 36/3 of the Law No. 5235. In accordance with the provisions of the jurisdiction of the judicial courts within the jurisdiction of the judicial courts in the jurisdiction of the judicial jurisdiction in the first instance of the regional courts of justice to resolve the jurisdiction and duty disputes between the first-instance courts to determine the location of all documents in the file were examined, the necessary was considered:

DECISION

The case concerns the request for issuance of an inheritance certificate.
A Magistrates’ Court of Justice, the legacy of the Federal Republic of X is a citizen, the last settlement is not claimed to be in Izmir and there is no such evidence in the direction of the land located in the province of Mersin, Silifke district was decided in jurisdiction.

B Magistrates’ Court decided not to issue a certificate of inheritance in the cases of the issuance of the certificate of inheritance, that the parties did not have any objection to the authority, and that the court could not be given the decision of jurisdiction.

Dosya kapsamından, uyuşmazlığın, davacıların murisine ait mirasçılık belgesi verilmesi istemine dair olduğu anlaşılmıştır.
Mirasçılık istemi, 6100 Sayılı HMK’nın geçici 3/2. maddesi ve HMK’nın 382. maddesinde çekişmesiz yargı işlerinden sayılmış 384. maddede ise kanunda aksine hüküm bulunmadıkça, çekişmesiz yargı işleri için talepte bulunan kişinin veya ilgililerden birinin oturduğu yer mahkemesi yetkili olduğu, HMK’nın 11/3. maddesinde ise mirasçılık belgesinin iptali ve yeni mirasçılık belgesi verilmesine dair davalarda mirasçıların her birinin oturduğu yer mahkemesinin de yetkili olduğu belirtilmiştir. Bu hale göre, mirasçılık belgesinin verilmesi davalarında kesin yetki kuralı olmadığına göre davanın açıldığı ilk mahkeme olan İzmir 10. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesinde görülüp sonuçlandırılması gerekir.

SONUÇ : Yukarıda belirtilen nedenlerle; 6100 Sayılı HMK’nın 21 ve 22. maddeleri gereğince İzmir 10. Sulh Hukuk Mahkemesi’nin yargı yeri olarak belirlenmesine 15/01/2018 gününde oy birliğiyle karar verildi.

T.C.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran