Evaluation Of Evidence Seized In Violation Of Law - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16800
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16800,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Evaluation Of Evidence Seized In Violation Of Law

Evaluation Of Evidence Seized In Violation Of Law

In order to uncover the material truth in the criminal trial, it is investigated whether the elements of the crime are formed and who the perpetrator is if there is a crime. However, the investigation and investigation carried out during the trial is not unlimited. The material truth must be reached within the rules of law by protecting the personal values and social values of the accused.

The principle of “freedom of evidence” applies in Criminal Procedure. This principle means that the judge shall freely evaluate the evidence, provided that it is in accordance with the law. While the evidence obtained in accordance with the law is freely evaluated, various limitations have been imposed in the Constitution and in the Criminal Procedure Law in terms of the evaluation of the evidence obtained illegally.

217 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure. Article 2. In its paragraph ” the charged offence can be proved with any evidence obtained in accordance with the law.”in the form of sentencing, it is arranged that the charged crime will be proved only by the evidence obtained in accordance with the law.

38 of the Constitution. “Findings obtained in violation of the law cannot be accepted as evidence.”the regulation in the form of evidence against the law will not be evaluated, it has been stated.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran