Decision To Block Access- Supreme Court Ruling For Fake Twitter and Face

09 Apr Decision To Block Access- Supreme Court Ruling For Fake Twitter and Face

7.Criminal Division 2014/5036 E. , 2014/12937 K.

In order to remove the user name and profile picture of the twitter account created with the username @ertemsener on the social networking site called Twitter and the contents of the spoofed tweet on this account.. P.. Büyükçekmece 1. The authority Büyükçekmece 8 on the rejection of the appeal against the decision of the Magistrates ‘ Court dated 29/05/2013 and amended labour number 2013/1077. Case file of the Court of First Instance Criminal Court dated 12/07/2013 and 2013/186 amended Labor no.order against the high Ministry of Justice 13/01/2014 day and 2892 for the benefit of the law containing the request to break the case file 24/01/2014 days of the Supreme Court of public prosecutor’s office and PUK. It was read with Notice No. 2014/22872 being given to the circle.

In the aforementioned notice;

Law No. 5651 on the regulation of internet publications and the fight against crimes committed through these publications 9/1-2. article, “people who claim that rights have been violated due to Content, content provider by contacting the provider in case of failure to reach it and that its content be removed from the scope of the publication of the publication from most prepared may request that the answer be published in the internet for a week. The content or location provider fulfills the request within two days of its arrival. If the request is not fulfilled during this period, it is deemed rejected. If the request is deemed rejected, the person may apply to the settlement Magistrates Court within fifteen days to decide whether the content should be removed from publication and the response prepared not more than the scope of the publication should be published on the internet for a period of one week. The magistrate decides this request without a hearing within three days. An appeal may be made against the decision of the magistrate in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure.”when the arrangement is taken into consideration, the user name and profile picture of the twitter account created with @ertemsener user name and the content of the fake tweet contained in this account are in violation of the honor and dignity of the person concerned and damage their personality rights, the shares made from the fake twitter account created in question, as if A..P..it causes an impression that it belongs to, in the face of the understanding that twitt was sent to the profile mentioned with the belief that the user name of the subject of the complaint belongs to the concerned person, no hit was seen in the decision to reject the objection in writing instead of accepting it and no.309 of the Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271. in accordance with the article, it was considered to be discussed and considered on behalf of the Turkish nation by having been denounced in reference to distorting the necessity of the said decision for the benefit of the law.;

Büyükçekmece 8.th the contents of the notice, which is based on the request of the Chief Prosecutor of the court of Cassation for the benefit of the law, are seen in place. 12.07.2013 days of the Criminal Court of First Instance and 2013/186 D.309 of the CMK of Decision No.on 19/06/2014, it was unanimously decided to remove the user name and profile picture and tweet content on the twitter account @ertemsener user.