Criminal Law Lapse Of Time - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17424
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17424,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Criminal Law Lapse Of Time

28 Aug Criminal Law Lapse Of Time

Posted at 22:15h in General by
0 Likes

Supreme Court 6.Criminal Division
Retrieved 2012
Main No: 2010/2170
Decision No: 2013/72
Source: UYAP
Related Articles: TCK 143 and 66 MAD.
Related Concepts: 143.ARTICLE-STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

T.C.
SUPREME
6. Criminal Division
ON BEHALF OF THE TURKISH NATION

Basis No: 2010/2170 On Distortion
Decision No: 2013/72
Communique No: 6-2007/120398

DECISION UNDER REVIEW;
Court: Bakırköy 1. Criminal Court Of First Instance
Date: 13/12/2006
Number: 2005/1081 (E) and 2006/999 (K)
Accused: Mehmet Metin NAZLICAN
Crime: theft
Sentencing: conviction
Appellant : defense of the accused
Thought in the communique : distortion

The verdict given by the Local Court was appealed; the file was discussed according to the nature, type of punishment, duration and date of crime of the application:

493/1, 102/3, 104/2 of tcy No. 765, which corresponds to the action of the accused. according to articles 142/1-B, 143/1, 53, 66/1-e, 67/4, which comply with the same crime of TCI No. 5237, which entered into force on 01.06.2005. as a result of the application of the articles separately and as a whole, 7/2 of the aforementioned law, 9/3 of law 5252. in light of the provisions of law 5237 in terms of statute of limitations, the benefit of the defendant and the crime was committed from 17.04.2000 until the date of review of the same law 66/1-e, 67/4. past the 12-year period provided for in the articles,

8/1 of Law No. 5320, since the appeal of the defense of the accused Mehmet Metin Nazlıcan and the thought in the communique were seen in place with this reputation, the provision was violated for the reason described, the reason for the violation does not require a retrial. article 322 of Cmuk No. 1412. based on the authority granted by the article, it was decided by a vote on 14.01.2013 that the public case against the defendant should be dropped due to the statute of limitations.

Tags:
, , , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran