General

CANCELLATION OF TITLE DEEDS DUE TO SIMULATION

T.C SUPREME COURT 1.Department of Law, Base: 2019/3518 Decision: 2020/762 Decision Date: 10.02.2020 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT…

3 years ago

THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STOREY OWNERS BOARD ON OPENING A WORKPLACE

T.C SUPREME COURT 20.Legal Department, Base : 2019/ 4647 Decision: 2020 / 225 Decision Date: 20.01.2020 THE DECISION OF THE…

3 years ago

ALTHOUGH THE PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE CASE WAS DECIDED IN THE PARAGRAPH OF THE JUDGMENT, THE ATTORNEY FEE WAS NOT ASSESSED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT

T.C SUPREME COURT 20.Legal Department Base: 2019/ 3523 Decision: 2019 / 6673 Decision Date: 18.11.2019 ABSTRACT: The case is one…

3 years ago

IT IS CLEAR FROM THE EXPERT REPORT THAT THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT PAY THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE WORK THAT THE PLAINTIFF MUST PAY ON THE DELIVERY DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT NO LATER THAN THE TIME AGREED IN THE CONTRACT

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department Base: 2019/ 2487 Decision: 2020 / 654 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 SUMMARY: According to the scope…

3 years ago

THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK CONTRACT – THE NEED TO BE DECIDED ACCORDING TO THE RESULT BY OBTAINING AN ADDITION REPORT FROM EXPERTS ON THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION SITE GROWTH AND THE DISMISSAL OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY ON THE DURATION – THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Law Department, Base: 2019 / 2119 Decision: 2020 / 662 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: Although the plaintiff-defendant…

3 years ago

A CASE ARISING FROM A WORK CONTRACT – A DECISION THAT HE WILL RECEIVE A SMALLER AMOUNT OF MERIT BY DEDUCTING A CASH GUARANTEE, AS HE WILL RECEIVE AN UNPAID WORK FEE – A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Law Department Base: 2019/1938 Decision: 2020/675 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: While the court should have decided that…

3 years ago

REFUSAL OF THE PETITION FOR CORRECTION OF THE DECISION

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department Date of Issue: 2019/ 2160 Decision: 2020 / 679 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: As for…

3 years ago

COMPENSATION CASE – THE AMOUNT REJECTED IN THE DECISION ON ITS COLLECTION IS OF A DEFINITE NATURE, SINCE IT FALLS UNDER THE LIMIT OF APPEAL IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT – REFUSAL OF THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY’S APPEALS

T.C SUPREME COURT 23.Legal Department Basis: 2016/ 9666 Decision: 2020 / 1094 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: The amount rejected by…

3 years ago

DECOMMISSIONING OF THE APPEAL – ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE ADDITION TYPE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIFICATION, THE ADMINISTRATION CAN CHECK WHETHER THE WORKERS’ LABOR RIGHTS AND RECEIVABLES HAVE BEEN PAID – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION

T.C SUPREME COURT 23.Legal Department Base: 2016/ 9622 Decision: 2020 / 1098 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 Summary: the court's claim, defense,…

3 years ago

CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE START DATES OF INTEREST THAT WILL BE PROCESSED ON CLAIMS OTHER THAN SEVERANCE PAY, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CLAIMS SUBJECT TO A DEFAULT WARNING AND A DEFAULT WARNING ACCORDINGLY – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

T.C COURT OF CASSATION 9.Legal Department Base: 2016/ 34036 Decision: 2020 / 2430 Decision Date: 18.02.2020 ABSTRACT: While the starting…

3 years ago
Show more Posts
Show previous Posts