Case Of Cancellation Of Recognition Due To Deception - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17662
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17662,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Case Of Cancellation Of Recognition Due To Deception

Case Of Cancellation Of Recognition Due To Deception

PLAINTIFF :

Deputy :

DEFENDANT :

Subject: prompt decision to cancel recognition.

INSTRUCTIONS

1 -) My client recognized the defendants …by his written application to the population Directorate in the history of …/…/… and established a pedigree between them. The other defendant … is the mother of the known child.

2 -) My client made this recognition with the descriptions of the defendant …and thinking that the child was his child. However, he then wants to cancel the recognition because he understands that the defendant is cheating on him.

3 -) therefore, it has become mandatory to sue for the cancellation of recognition.

Legal reasons: 4721 P. K. m. 297 and related legislation.

Legal evidence: Population Registration, DNA tests, witness statements and other evidence.

CONCLUSION AND PROMPT

For the reasons explained above, I respectfully request your Supreme Court to decide whether my client’s recognition of the defendant was canceled due to deception, that the costs of the trial be burdened with the defendant. …/…/…

Acting Plaintiff

Attorney

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran