Case For Transition To Extraordinary Goods Regime - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
18691
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-18691,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Case For Transition To Extraordinary Goods Regime

Case For Transition To Extraordinary Goods Regime

Case For Transition To Extraordinary Goods Regime
Spouses “together” when they wish
the right to change the current regime of goods between them within borders
references But in some cases, the current regime of goods between them
spouses may also need to change, change, without moving “together.” Spouses are subject to a regime of participation in acquired goods, division of shared goods, participation in acquired goods in accordance with the law, if they have chosen one of the regimes of partnership in goods, or because they do not enter into a contract with the regime of goods
if they did; on changing the current property regime between them
even if they have no common demands, in some cases they exist between them
the transformation of the goods regime into the “separation of goods” regime is regulated in our law as the extraordinary goods regime. For example, among them
in the event of bankruptcy of one of the spouses in the” property partnership ” regime, the property partnership regime will spontaneously turn into a property separation regime with the bankruptcy decision (TMK m. 209). From spouses who accept a property partnership
389
a creditor pursuing enforcement proceedings against someone, in the implementation of the foreclosure
if he suffers damage, he will be able to ask the judge to decide whether to move to a “separation of property” (TMK m. 210). If one of the spouses is constantly deprived of the power to distinguish; his legal representative is also TMK
206. according to the article, it will be able to file a claim for a transition to the separation of goods. TMK 206.
by the family court at the request of one of the spouses, if there is another justifiable reason shown in the article or similar
it will be decided to convert the existing property regime between spouses into “property separation”. The importance of this case is as follows: although the marriage union between the spouses continues, If this case is accepted and the decision is finalized, other cases for the liquidation of the property regime will be opened and,
it will be possible to examine its merits.
Officer in the case of transition to extraordinary property regime (separation of goods)
the court is a family court and is subject to victim trial fees and victim power of attorney fees. If the competent court is any of the spouses
the settlement court (TMK m. 207).

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran