Yağız Canseven, Author at AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE - Page 52 of 120
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
4
archive,paged,author,author-diyojen07,author-4,paged-52,author-paged-52,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Author: Yağız Canseven

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 4.law office Based on: 2015/16555 Decision: 2016/8360 Date of Decision: 27.06.2016 REQUEST FOR FORECLOSURE - ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE BEFORE REGISTRATION – THE REGISTRATION DECISION IS A DECLARATORY TRANSACTION, NOT A CONSTITUENT TRANSACTION – THE FAILURE OF THE DECISION TO REJECT THE REQUEST...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2015/7834 Decision: 2016/7381 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION ARISING FROM THE KEEPING OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE–INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER THE REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED AS A LAND PLOT - DECISIVENESS OF...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 5.law office Main: 2016/3179 Decision: 2016/11873 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE OF DETERMINATION OF THE EXPROPRIATION PRICE – THE EXPROPRIATION PRICE DETERMINED AFTER THE CANCELLATION IS THE SAME AS THE PRICE DETERMINED BY THE FIRST DECISION – THE ENTIRE EXPROPRIATION PRICE IS...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 15.law office Issue: 2015/4549 Decision: 2016/3863 Date of Decision: 14.07.2016 CASE OF COLLECTION OF RECEIVABLES - THE NEED TO JUDGE THE FEES AND ATTORNEY'S FEES IN CASES AS A VICTIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM WAGE TARIFF OF THE LAWYER – THE BANKRUPTCY...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8400 Decision: 2016/7557 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – UPON EXPRESSING AN OPINION ON THE REJECTION OF THE REQUEST BY THE REJECTED JUDGE, IT WAS DECIDED TO REJECT THE REJECTION REQUEST BY THE AUTHORITY EXAMINING THE FILE AND PUNISH...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3.Criminal Department Based on: 2015/34296 Decision: 2016/15146 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 INJURY OFFENCE – THE CHILD WHO HAS BEEN DRAGGED INTO THE CRIME DOES NOT HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD PREVENTING POSTPONEMENT – THE CONDITIONS ARE DISCUSSED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO ALLOW...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran