Appeal Against The Administrative Oversight Decision - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17556
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17556,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Appeal Against The Administrative Oversight Decision

14 Nov Appeal Against The Administrative Oversight Decision

Posted at 20:12h in General by
0 Likes

… TO THE MAGISTRATE’S COURT

CONTESTING :

Deputy :

Subject: our objections to the administrative supervision decision.

INSTRUCTIONS

1 -) Our client ….. …….., ….. he is a citizen of his country … / … / … in the name of entering Turkey on the date….. He arrived at the customs gate, where the searches were evaluated in the category “those who were found to have arrived in Turkey despite the ban on entry to Turkey” and the decision to deport him was made.

2 -) in a later review, 54 of the law on foreigners and international protection No. 6458. Article 2. “The deportation decision was made, ” he said.; escape and the risk of loss in for violating the rules of entry or exit to Turkey, using false or fake document, not recognized in time to leave Turkey without an acceptable excuse, public order, public security or public health posing a serious threat to administrative supervision by the governor’s office about the decision to be taken.”An administrative oversight decision was made against our client based on the legal basis and he was sent to the repatriation center on the date.

3 -) Our client was held at the repatriation center …/…/… from the date …/…/… and after the expiration of 6 months 54 of the law on foreigners and international protection No. 6458. Article 3. “The period of administrative supervision in repatriation centers cannot exceed six months. But this period can be extended for a maximum of six months if the deportation proceedings cannot be completed due to the foreigner’s lack of cooperation or failure to provide accurate information or documents related to his country.”It was decided to extend it for another 6 months, citing the arrangement.

4 -) there are no conditions for making an extension decision, and all conditions exist for sending our client to his country, so it is necessary to appeal this decision and apply to your court to ensure that our client is sent to his country.

CONCLUSION AND PROMPT

For the reasons described above, we supply and demand that our client be sent to his country by proxy on behalf of our client. …/…/…

Tags:
, , , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran