A STATEMENT OF TESTIMONY FROM A PERSON WHO HEARS THREATS AND INSULTS OVER A MOBILE PHONE SPEAKER IS VALID - SUPREME COURT DECISION - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
21341
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-21341,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

A STATEMENT OF TESTIMONY FROM A PERSON WHO HEARS THREATS AND INSULTS OVER A MOBILE PHONE SPEAKER IS VALID – SUPREME COURT DECISION

10 Jul A STATEMENT OF TESTIMONY FROM A PERSON WHO HEARS THREATS AND INSULTS OVER A MOBILE PHONE SPEAKER IS VALID – SUPREME COURT DECISION

Posted at 22:37h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C.
Supreme Court
4. Criminal Department

Base No:2013/8808
Decision No:2015/23904
Decision Date:

 

CASE AND DECISION: The provisions issued by the Local Court were appealed, the duration of the application and the nature of the decision and the file were discussed according to the date of the crime.

 

Since there were no reasons for the refusal of the appeal request, the essence of the work was moved.

 

In the examination conducted according to the content of the minutes, documents and justification reflecting the trial process in which the conscientious opinion is formed,

 

I am a participant and a witness. A.in the consistent statements of the stages, when they were working together at the municipal box office at about 21:00, when the speaker of the mobile phone turned on, “o …. whore, I will make you a bullet maniac” in the face of threats and insults stating that he was, for what reason the defense was not explained and on insufficient grounds to acquit him of both crimes,

 

CONCLUSION: It was decided unanimously on 06.03.2015 that the file should be sent to the court of main/sentence for continuation and conclusion starting from the pre-trial stage of the trial, since the reasons of appeal of the deputy Sultan Geyikci who violated the law and participated were seen at the place of thought in the communiqué, the provisions were overturned.

You can reach ourt other court decision examples from clicking here.

Tags:
, , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran