Embezzlement And Abuse Of Trust - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17648
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17648,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Embezzlement And Abuse Of Trust

Embezzlement And Abuse Of Trust

T.C.
SUPREME
5. CRIMINAL DIVISION
Base No: 2012/12683
Decision No: 2014/47
K. Historical :

5. Department Of Corrections 2012/12683 E. , 2014/47 K.

“Case Law Text”

Communique No: 15-2012/42078
Court: Uskudar 2. (Istanbul Anadolu 6.) Criminal Court
Date: 16/11/2009
Number: 2009/319 basis, 2009/397 decision
Crime: embezzlement

The ruling was appealed by the Local Court and the case was reviewed.;
Cmk’s 260/1. according to Article 18 of the law No. 3628, the Treasury, which has been damaged by the crime in such a way as to take the adjective participating, has the right to apply to the legal path and the provision is appealed by its deputy with a petition dated 30/11/2011. 237/2 of article and CMK. based on the authority granted by the article, it was considered necessary after the decision was made to accept the Treasury’s request to participate:
According to CCC No. 399 as of the dates of the crime, Turkey Electrical Communication A.P.grid facility 2. The accused, who is employed in the contract service staff in the Legal Consultancy of the group Directorate and who is actually acting as a case follow-up officer in accordance with the oral instructions, a decision to eliminate a public case due to a statute of limitations, considering that its actions in the form of acquiring goods in the form of advances that it has closed by repeating the expense documents approved by the unit’s lawyers during the deduction of business advances received for fees and legal expenses in the court and enforcement offices to which the institution is a party constitute a simple crime of chain embezzlement,
By admissions;
223/8 of CMK 5271 due to the statute of limitations of the public case. decision to eliminate rather than fall under the article,
8/1 of the law No. 5320 of the provision, since the appeals of the trustees of the Treasury were considered in place in this respect. article 321 of the Cmuk. it was decided by unanimous decision on 06/01/2014.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran