T.C.
\nSupreme Court
\n8. Criminal Department<\/p>\n
Base No :2018\/7291
\nDecision No :2018\/10165
\nD. Date :2.10.2018<\/p>\n
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
\nOFFENSE : Slander
\nVERDICT : Acquittal<\/p>\n
It was discussed and considered as necessary:<\/p>\n
In order for a libel crime to occur, it is necessary to attribute an illegal act to a person in order to ensure that an investigation and prosecution are initiated or an administrative sanction is imposed on him, even if he knows that he did not commit it by notifying or complaining to the competent authorities, in a concrete event; the defendant animosity between them, which is the complainant, without the certificate working in the intensive care unit intensive care, patients are consciously separated by complainant of life support, reached him, and in the watches of the complainant that the complaint has been EKS arrrest to file a complaint with Bimer with a lot of cases, the preliminary review by the hospital administration as a result of unfounded allegations about participating, in the face of determining that it is based on personal considerations, the defendant’s conviction for libel, consisting of subut and elements, should be decided with a written justification instead of his conviction,
\nContrary to the law, since the appeals of the participating deputy have been considered in place as of this date, the provision is therefore 8\/1 of the Law No. 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be implemented in accordance with its article.No. 321. its DETERIORATION in accordance with the article was decided unanimously on 02.10.2018.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n