T.C.
\nSupreme C ourt
\n8. Criminal Department<\/p>\n
Base No:2017\/12704
\nDecision No :2017\/14128
\nDecision Date:12.12.2017<\/p>\n
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
\nOFFENSE : Slander
\nVERDICT : Acquittal<\/p>\n
It was discussed and considered as necessary:
\nIn the history of the event when you cut a tree, although she couldn’t see the victims claiming to see when you cut a tree, upon being initiated in response to an investigation into the victims, the defendant’s deliberate slander notice the presence of trees continues to cut the scene because it knows it doesn’t victims, even though the forest had committed the offence of opposition to the law to bet that the TCL charge due to the presence of the realization of the ends, and loaded with felony convictions in terms of the elements instead of written justification for his acquittal decision,
\nContrary to the law, since the appeals of the Public Prosecutor have been considered in place as of this date, the provision is therefore 8\/1 of the Law No. 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be implemented in accordance with its article.No. 321. its DETERIORATION in accordance with the article was decided unanimously on the day of 12.12.2017.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n