T.C.
\nSupreme Court
\n8. Criminal Department<\/p>\n
Base No :2017\/14038
\nDecision No :2018\/1646
\nD. Date :19.2.2018<\/p>\n
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
\nOFFENSE : Slander
\nSENTENCE : Conviction<\/p>\n
It was discussed and considered as necessary:
\nFor the crime of slander or make a complaint to the competent authorities occur in order to know that he didn’t commit by the report about them, the initiation of Investigation and prosecution of an unlawful act or an administrative sanction should be attributed to a person to ensure the implementation of the file according to the scope of the defendant’s plea may be based on a part of the case, and the act did not commit a crime in Article 74 of the Constitution are not to blame anyone and she knew that format. constitutional petition guaranteed by article …exercising the right to complain, the fact that his claim about the victim he is complaining about cannot be proven that the defendant has committed a libel crime cannot be considered proof that he has committed a libel crime, instead of an acquittal of a libel crime that has not occurred in connection with jihad, his conviction will be decided in writing,
\nSince the appeals of the defendant’s defense were considered in place as of this moment, the decision was therefore made in accordance with Section 8\/1 of Law 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be implemented in accordance with its article.No. 321. its DETERIORATION in accordance with the article was decided unanimously on 19.02.2018.<\/p>\n