<\/p>\n
T.C<\/p>\n
Supreme Court 12. Legal Department Principal No: 2018\/3154
\nDecision No: 2018\/7106
\nDecision Date: 02.07.2018<\/p>\n
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
\nCourt:Executive Law Court
\nThe creditor of the appellant examination within the period of the court decision, whose date and number are written above
\nthe case file was sent to the apartment from the file site upon request by
\nfor all documents in the file after the report issued by the audit judge … has been heard and
\nafter being read and examined, the necessity of the work was discussed and considered:
\nDebtor’s attorney in application to the court of execution; other objections against his client in addition to the execution with a writ
\nfollow-up has been initiated, follow-up has not been finalized, because it is aimed at the person’s law
\nrequest that the cancellation of the follow-up be decided by asserting that the subject of follow-up cannot be made without finalization
\nthe court, the family and the person can not be executed without finalization of the legal rulings,
\nThe decision given by the court of intellectual and industrial rights to the personal rights of the plaintiff-legal person
\nnon-enforceable without confirmation of compensation for unauthorized use
\nthe request was accepted on the grounds that it was decided to cancel the follow-up.
\nProvisional 3 of the law on Civil Procedure No. 6100. should be applied by sending the article
\nHumk’s 443\/1. in accordance with the article, the appeal does not stop the execution of the decision. So as a rule, the decision
\nthe fact that it has not been finalized does not prevent the decision from being carried out. Exceptions to this rule are also in the laws
\narranged.
\nProclamations concerning the law of the family and the person (HUMK.443\/4 m.) can not be executed without certainty. Cited
\nthe provisions mentioned in the article are included in the \u201cPersons Law\u201d and \u201cfamily law\u201d books of the Civil Code.
\nnot all provisions related to the subject matter, but the person’s direct personal or family structure related to the legal
\nit is the injunctions that make changes in the situation and the provisions of these pronouncements (e.g.
\nfirst name,last name, age revision, Nez of custody, paternity case, nesep revision, divorce and its fer
\nsuch as provisions of nature…). Again, the child delivery and personal relationship with the child related notices
\nda cannot be exercised unless it is finalized (Baki Kuru-Manual of enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, pages 923-924).
\nIn the concrete case, the basis of the execution follow-up, Istanbul 3. Intellectual and industrial Rights Law Court
\n2012\/110 E., 2015\/16 K., Decree dated 03.02.2015, unauthorized use of artful images
\narising from Act No. 68 of 5846. to receive the requested copyright compensation in accordance with the article
\nrelated. The law of the person, but the legal cases of the parties related to the person
\nin order to be able to be followed because it does not produce a changing result but only affects its assets
\nit doesn’t have to be final.
\nIn that case, the court should decide on the rejection of this complaint and the other reasons in the complaint petition based on the result that will occur by examining, while the decision on the cancellation of the follow-up with written justification is not accurate.
\nConclusion: acceptance of the appeal appeals of the creditor and the decision of the court for reasons written above
\nIik’s 366 and Humk’s 428. in accordance with the articles (deterioration), the request for the mortar received in advance
\nin case of return, within 10 days of the notification of the decree to be clear the way to correct the decision,
\nOn day 02.07.2018, a unanimous decision was made.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C Supreme Court 12. Legal Department Principal No: 2018\/3154 Decision No: 2018\/7106 Decision Date: 02.07.2018 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT Court:Executive Law Court The creditor of the appellant examination within the period of the court decision, whose date and number are written above…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[217,223,225,220,218],"yoast_head":"\n