T.C. SUPREME
\n9. Legal Department<\/p>\n
Principal No: 2007\/14430
\nDecision No: 2008\/8214
\nDate Of Decision: 11.04.2008<\/p>\n
LABOR CLAIMS CASE \u2013 THE WORK OF THE CLAIMANT’S MARRIED WIFE
\nTO THIS CITY BY MARRIAGE BECAUSE IT IS IN ANOTHER PROVINCE
\nTHE REASON FOR THE CHANGE IN THE PROVINCE \u2013 WHICH HE STATED WAS SETTLED-IS FROM MARRIAGE
\nSOURCE-ACCEPTANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S SEVERANCE REQUEST
\nRequirement<\/p>\n
Summary: The plaintiff married his wife’s business in another province because of the marriage settled in this city
\nrefers to. The reason for the provincial change in this case is due to marriage. When I get like this
\nthe plaintiff’s request for severance must be accepted.
\n(1475 P. K. m. 14)
\nLawsuit: the plaintiff requested that the severance payment be decided.
\nThe Local Court dismissed the case.
\nHaving been appealed by the plaintiff’s lawyer during the sentencing period, the examination for the case file
\nHakimi Y. After listening to the report prepared by Tekba\u015f, the file was examined and the need was spoken about.
\nconsidered:
\nVerdict: the petition that the plaintiff woman married on 02.08.2003 and gave to the employer on 21.08.2003
\nit is not in dispute that he stated that he was leaving his job due to the provincial change.
\nThe reason for termination of the claimant’s severance payment request by the court;
\nit was decided to reject it on the grounds that it was not shown.
\n14 Of The Labor Act No. 1475. article work within 1 year from the date of the woman’s marriage
\nunder the rule that severance pay will be paid if he terminates his contract at his own request.
\nhas been given. In the concrete case, the plaintiff married his wife because of the fact that his business is in another province, by marrying this
\nit means that he settled in the city. The reason for the provincial change is due to marriage. State
\nit has not been claimed that the amendment and dissolution were based on any other reason.
\nAccording to the ingrained case law of our department, the reason for termination can be explained in the petition and is true
\nthe existence of the cause is determined by the court.
\nIn this case, provision should be established in writing instead of acceptance of the claimant’s request for severance pay.
\nis incorrect.
\nConclusion: if the decision of the appeal is overturned for the reason stated above, the fee for the appeal received in advance
\nupon request, it was decided unanimously on 11.04.2008.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. SUPREME 9. Legal Department Principal No: 2007\/14430 Decision No: 2008\/8214 Date Of Decision: 11.04.2008 LABOR CLAIMS CASE \u2013 THE WORK OF THE CLAIMANT’S MARRIED WIFE TO THIS CITY BY MARRIAGE BECAUSE IT IS IN ANOTHER PROVINCE THE REASON FOR THE CHANGE IN THE PROVINCE…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[217,223,220,218,526,360,254],"yoast_head":"\n