SENTRY COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE<\/p>\n
ANTALYA<\/p>\n
PLAINTIFF :<\/p>\n
ADDRESS :<\/p>\n
Regents :<\/p>\n
ADDRESS :<\/p>\n
Defendant: Antalya Provincial Directorate of Population and Citizenship<\/p>\n
ADDRESS :<\/p>\n
Subject: regarding our request to correct the population record for the name change based on the justifiable reason for our client.<\/p>\n
INSTRUCTIONS<\/p>\n
The name of our plaintiff client is on The Register….. it is written as. But our client’s entire circle … . he knows her by name. Even his next of kin have been listed in our client’s registration ….. not knowing his name, anyone who knows our client … he knows her by name. In this context ….. his name creates various difficulties in our client’s daily life. Therefore, it is necessary to change the name of the client.
\nIn view of the above mentioned issues, the name of our client is known and recognized by everyone …. we have an obligation to demand that it be changed.
\nThe established case law states that a change of name must be accepted because the person is recognized by a different name. The relevant Supreme Court decision is as follows:;
\nT.C. Supreme Court 18. Department of law E. 2011\/9929 K. 2011\/12617 T. 12.12.2011<\/p>\n
Verdict: the plaintiffs in the lawsuit petition, claiming that their daughter under their custody was known by the name \u201cDersim\u201d and requested that the name \u201cDilan\u201d written in the Population Register be changed to \u201cDersim\u201d.<\/p>\n
In accordance with the provisions of Article 27 of the Turkish Civil Code No. 4721, a person may ask the judge to change his name on the basis of justifiable reasons, in the applications of the Supreme Court, a person may use the name he is known around and ask for registration with the population under this name, provided that it is not In the concrete case, it is understood from the contents of the file that the Daughters of the plaintiffs are known by the name \u201cDersim\u201d, that the request should be accepted because there is a right reason to change the name, but it was not considered right to dismiss the case on grounds that are not in place.<\/p>\n
Conclusion: in this respect, without taking into account the principles described above, the provision in written form is without fault, and the appeal appeals are in place for these reasons, so that the provision is accepted by H.U.M.K.nun 428. it was decided unanimously on 12.12.2011 to have the application annulled in accordance with the article and to return the application fee to the appellant if requested.<\/p>\n
As a result of the reasons we have explained and the witnesses we will listen to, our client is surrounded by \u201c….”the work he is known for is therefore listed in our client’s register as”….\u201d your name”….”it remains to be seen that it should be replaced by the name. Legal evidence: (witness, oath, expert, etc. evidence to be relied upon must be expressed)
\nLegal evidence : expert witnesses, witnesses and other legal evidence of any kind\u2026<\/p>\n
Legal reasons: Turkish Civil Code, judicial case law and related legislation<\/p>\n
DEMAND AND OUTCOME<\/p>\n
In accordance with the above mentioned matters and the matters that the court will consider if you are re;<\/p>\n
Acceptance of our rightful cause,
\nThe name of our client, known and recognized by all”…..”we respectfully request and supply and demand the necessary information to be changed.<\/p>\n
Plaintiff \u2026..<\/p>\n
Regents<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
SENTRY COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE ANTALYA PLAINTIFF : ADDRESS : Regents : ADDRESS : Defendant: Antalya Provincial Directorate of Population and Citizenship ADDRESS : Subject: regarding our request to correct the population record for the name change based on the justifiable reason for our client….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[217,223,220,218,502,300],"yoast_head":"\n