Summary:<\/p>\n
\u00a3 1,500 given directly. 8\/1 of Law No. 5320, due to the fact that its decision on the judicial fine was of definite quality in terms of quantity. sending the article is still in force in accordance with Article 305\/last article of Cmuk No. 1412 can not be taken into consideration the basis of repetition,<\/p>\n
T.C.
\nSupreme
\n3. Criminal Department<\/p>\n
Principal No: 2014\/36032
\nDecision No: 2015\/12450
\nK. Date: 8.4.2015<\/p>\n
The sentence given by the Local Court is appealed and the paperwork is read;
\nNeed to be discussed and considered;
\nRejection of other appellate appeals, however;
\nKaradeniz Ere\u011fli 1. E. Of The Criminal Court Of First Instance2010\/402-K. 1.500 TL issued directly with the decree no.2012\/148. 8\/1 of Law No. 5320, due to the fact that its decision on the judicial fine was of definite quality in terms of quantity. sending the article is still in force in accordance with Article 305\/last article of Cmuk No. 1412 can not be taken into consideration the basis of repetition,
\nBecause the appeal appeals of the accused were thus deemed in place, the provision was therefore amended 8\/1 of Law No. 5320. article 321 of the Cmuk No. 1412 in force. in accordance with the article, it was decided unanimously on 08\/04\/2015 that the request should be impaired.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Summary: \u00a3 1,500 given directly. 8\/1 of Law No. 5320, due to the fact that its decision on the judicial fine was of definite quality in terms of quantity. sending the article is still in force in accordance with Article 305\/last article of Cmuk No….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[217,223,220,218,344],"yoast_head":"\n