Decision Making And Implementation Of Precautionary Measures
\nIt is possible for the decision of the injunction to be taken and implemented within the period during which the execution is halted. Because
\nThere was no regulation on this issue in the resolution. So far, according to material law
\nholidays are not applied in terms of lawsuits to be filed. Also, the cases that have been opened and are being considered
\nthere is no regulation for postponement.
\nExecution And Bankruptcy Proceedings And The Status Of The Periods Related To Follow-Up Law
\nA clear regulation on the execution and bankruptcy and follow-up law in Decision No. 2279
\nhas been made.
\nBut published on 24.03.22020 by the Department of Executive Affairs of the Ministry of Justice
\nArticle No. 86420598-296 \/ 2543 \u2018 execution and Bankruptcy follow-up and follow-up during the holiday period of the periods related to the law
\nit will not operate\u2019 stated that the enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004 56. Talik mentioned in Article
\nthe application for the periods in their state is not possible to apply in the current situation and the execution and
\nwe believe that the terms of bankruptcy and follow-up law should stop.
\nPayment Of Money Taken Into Execution Coffers To Creditors
\nForeclosures made by the debtor on his own initiative or before the decision to stop execution
\ncontinued payments to the Enforcement Agency violate the rights of the debtor or third parties
\nwe believe that there is no harm in making payments to creditors by checking that they do not.
\nAs a matter of fact, published on 24.03.22020 by the Department of Executive Affairs of the Ministry of Justice
\nArticle No. 86420598-296\/2543, \u2018execution offices accepted payments within the scope of the file
\nit does not require an order and the rights of the debtor or third parties will not be violated.
\nin agreed circumstances the money will be paid to creditors”.
\nState Of Lien And Capture Comments If Payment Is Made
\n330 of Decision No. 2279 and enforcement and Bankruptcy Act No. 2004. The purpose of the substance \u2019epidemic, natural
\npayment of the debtor in consideration that in disasters such as disasters, the borrowers protect their interests
\nthe removal of sequestration and capture comments in the event of the debtor’s interests are contrary to the
\nsince it does not have to be able to perform the operations for the removal of the sequestration and capture commentary
\nwe believe that.
\nAs published on 24.03.22020 by the Department of Executive Affairs of the Ministry of Justice
\nArticle No. 86420598-296 \/ 2543; ” in case of payment of the file debt or with the request of the deputy creditor
\nlien and capture comments can be removed, file closure operations can be done first\u2019
\nit is stated<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Decision Making And Implementation Of Precautionary Measures It is possible for the decision of the injunction to be taken and implemented within the period during which the execution is halted. Because There was no regulation on this issue in the resolution. So far, according to…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[217,223,312,309,311,310,306,308,307,220,218],"yoast_head":"\n