T.C.
\nSUPREME
\n8. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
\nE. 2015\/15599
\nK. 2018\/332
\nT. 15.1.2018
\nAt the end of the proceedings between the parties and in the case described above
\nThe court has decided to dismiss the case and the verdict will be appealed by the plaintiff
\non it, the dossier was examined by the Department, considered necessary:
\nDecision: the debtor’s attorney, follow-up with an injunction based on the warrant that he will receive alimony against his client
\ninitiated, but alimony is regularly paid, starting in June 2013
\n6.000,00 requested with interest, stating that the joint children remain in the client’s possession
\nTL requested that the cancellation of the follow-up be decided in respect of the associate alimony.
\nThe court’s decision to change custody was finalized on 01.10.2014.
\na request for the abolition of associate alimony in a court decision on its replacement
\nand since there is no provision, alimony lasts until 01\/10\/2014, requested in follow-up
\nit is decided to reject the appeal on the grounds that the claim is prior to this date.
\nthe sentence was appealed by the debtor’s attorney.
\nIn the continuing case law of the Supreme Court; in respect of the child who is ruled in favor of alimony
\nthe child’s creditor is next to the debtor so that the debtor can be held responsible for paying child support
\nshould be found, the debtor has to claim that the child is staying with him
\nin the event, the rule was adopted that this claim could be proved with all kinds of evidence, including witnesses.
\nIn the concrete case, the follow-up basis is … 2. Basis of Family Court 20.01.2012 date 2012\/25
\n2012\/22 Decision No. 250,00 following the finalization of the decision for two children jointly with Decree No.
\n\u015fer TL participation alimony was decided and the decision was finalized on 27.02.2012. Lender
\nby proxy … 4. Execution Office’s follow-up File No. 2014\/10726 dated 22.08.2014
\nparticipation and poverty support in the period of 27.08.2013 – 27.07.2014 with follow-up request
\nclaims have been requested. \u2026 1. Family court 03.06.2014 date 2014\/31 basis 2014\/294
\nThe joint custody of the children was given to the father with the Decree No. 01.10.2014
\nit has been confirmed in its history. Child support of the debtor in respect of children who are ruled in favor of alimony
\nin order to be held liable for payment, the child must be present with the creditor. Debt
\narguing otherwise, the joint children have been on their side since June 2013.
\nhe claims to have stayed, and his claim can be proved with all kinds of evidence. Witness by debtor party
\nbased on his evidence. Accordingly, the court has decided that the joint children are due in June 2013.
\nfrom now on the decision is made without hearing the debtor’s witnesses that he has stayed with the father
\nisabetsiz is.
\nConclusion: with the acceptance of the appeal appeals of the debtor’s attorney, the decision of the court is written above
\nfor reasons 366 of iik and 428 of Humk. deterioration in accordance with the articles, by the parties
\nIik’s 366\/3. according to Article 10 against the proclamation from the notification of the Court of Cassation Office
\nif a decision correction request can be made within the day and a cash fee is requested
\nhis extradition to the appellant was decided unanimously on 15.01.2018.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
T.C. SUPREME 8. LEGAL DEPARTMENT E. 2015\/15599 K. 2018\/332 T. 15.1.2018 At the end of the proceedings between the parties and in the case described above The court has decided to dismiss the case and the verdict will be appealed by the plaintiff on it,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[298,223,220,218,297],"yoast_head":"\n