Wedding Jewelry
All the charms (bracelets, quarters, full gold, etc.) belong to the woman, which spouse hangs during the wedding. Men who wear men’s jewelry can only be specific to the use of men (for example, men’s cufflinks) belongs to the man. All other jewelery worn at the wedding; which belongs to the woman regardless of which spouse is worn by.
How to Open a Wedding Jewelry Case?
Requests for wedding jewelery can be put forward together with a divorce case, or after a divorce case is finalized.
In the case of a wedding case, the case should be opened as a progressive (gradual) case. In other words, if possible, the return of the jewelery items, if it is not possible, should be decided to pay the price of the jewelery. For example, a claim should be made as follows:
”I demand that the jewelery worn at the wedding, which consists of 8 bracelets, 17 full gold and 42 quarters gold, will be returned exactly, and if the return is not possible, the price should be paid with the legal interest.“
If the wedding jewelery is not returned, or if the refund is not possible, the payment of the price is an independent request which is not an attachment of divorce. For this reason, when demanding the jewelry in the divorce case, the relative fee for this claim must also be paid.
Wedding Jewelery in the case of divorce is included in the share of goods?
Since wedding jewelery is considered to be her personal property, she cannot be included in the calculation of the division of property in the divorce.
Wedding ornaments are spent on common necessities or wedding expenses in marriage, payment of the male’s debt with jewelry and so on. in case of divorce, even if the woman’s divorce in case of wedding jewelry, the male wife has the right to demand. If the woman gave her man the jewelery of her free will, provided they could not be returned, she can no longer ask for jewelry back. The man, however, must prove that the jewelry is given to him by the woman not to be returned.
What is Wedding Jewelery Litigation / Timeout Period?
If the wedding jewelery is in the possession of the defendant, that is to say, if the wedding jewelery is present during the trial, the case opened for his extradition is called a prosecution. It is not subject to any statute of limitations for opening a case for the return of the jewelery, the case can be opened at any time.
If the wedding jewelery is not available at the time of the filing of the case and the cost of the jewelery has not been returned by the plaintiff, it is 10 years. Because, if the demand for the return of the jewelery item is a rationale which is not subject to the statute of limitation, the claim for payment of the payment is a compensation case subject to a statutory limitation of 10 years.
Ten years of statutory limitation, if demanded for the cost of jewelery, starts from the finalization of the divorce case.
17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…
ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…
ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…
SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…
11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…
17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…