2. Civil Department

Base Number: 2015/10721

Decision Number: 2016/327

“text of jurisprudence”

COURT : Family Court
TYPE OF CASE :Mutual Divorce

The decision given by the local court at the end of the dec between the parties, the date and number shown above, was appealed by the plaintiff-counter defendant woman in both cases, the document was read and discussed and considered as necessary:
Although the court decided that the plaintiff-counter-defendant woman was completely defective and rejected the divorce case, from the investigation and collected evidence; It seems that the defendant-counter-plaintiff scolded and shouted at his wife and family, cursed at his wife and family, committed physical violence by walking over his wife and fired his wife and family, saying that he had taken your daughter. In this case, there is a living decency between the parties that will fundamentally shake up the common life and will not allow the continuation of the union, and it is constant. The plaintiff-counter-defendant woman is also right to sue in the face of the events that have taken place. The plaintiff-the counter-defendant woman’s written refusal to make a mistake in the appreciation of the evidence was not considered correct when it was necessary to decide on the acceptance of the divorce case.
CONCLUSION: Since the appealed decision will be re-established for the plaintiff-counter-plaintiff man’s divorce case for the reasons shown above, there is no room for the other appeals to be examined for now, the application fee will be returned to the depositor upon request, and the decision correction method will be open within 15 days of the notification of this decision.11.01.2016 (Mon.)