Supreme Court 5. Criminal Department
Principal No: 2014/6241
Decision No: 2014/8962

The accused C…for the crimes of being a member of a criminal organization in a system created for the supply of interests, incursion in a chain manner, is responsible for the crimes of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, 250/1, 43, 220/2 and 62. Articles 10 months imprisonment and 5 years 2 months 15 days imprisonment on the punishment of Edirne 1. Court of Cassation 5 of the decision of the Heavy Criminal Court dated 24/05/2006 and 2006/111 basis, 2006/198. The court’s decision dated 26/12/2006 and 2006/9880 basis, 2006/10661 was upheld and finalized, and the same court’s decision dated 15/01/2014 dated 2006/111 basis, 2006/198 additional decision on the rejection of the request for renewal of the trial made by the defendant defense was also rejected by the defendant defense 2. Decision of the High Criminal Court dated 07/02/2014 and amended work no. 2014/109;

According to the scope of the file, the request for renewal of the trial made by the defendant’s attorney with the petition dated 09/01/2014 is based on different evidence and the person in the images on the CDS shown as evidence and as justification for the defendant’s conviction is highly likely not the defendant when taken into account as a result of the expert opinion of the judicial video dated 25/02/2013, without evaluation of the merits of the request and the defendant was out of it enough to convict based on evidence which clearly indicated that in deciding whether a retrial should be in writing, without a denial of the request for acceptance of appeal against this decision and, instead, dismissed without legal justification provision to Article 309 of the Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271 has not been seen hitting bet. in accordance with the provisions of the Law No. 94660652-105-22-3525-2014-8856/30082 dated 05/05/2014, the Ministry of high justice General Directorate of Criminal Affairs stated that the need for corruption in accordance with the notification from the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation to the office with notification and:

Although a request has been made for a retrial based on a report by the National Criminal Bureau that the person in the camera footage used as evidence and showing acts deemed to be criminal… was not likely convicted, when these images were viewed at the hearing on 18/04/2006 and shown to the defendant, he denies the acts considered criminal but admits that he is, in addition, the National Crime Bureau issued the reports dated 25/02/2013 and 06/06/2013 when and by whom the photographs used in comparison were prepared, whether they belong to the person mentioned and whether they are suitable for comparison with the images of the accused in the criminal history are not safely determined and the referral is not provided, the person’s appearance will, since the reports received in these circumstances and which appear to be lacking in credibility cannot be considered as the reason for the renewal of the trial, there is no violation of the law in the refusal of the request of the convicted defender and it is understood that there is no wish to break the law for the benefit of The explained reasons, Edirne 2. The court of Cassation for the rejection of the request for annulment for the benefit of the law for the decision of the Heavy Criminal Court on 07/02/2014 and the amended Labor number 2014/109, for the sending of the file to the local area.His attorney general’S office was decided unanimously on 24/09/2014.