Categories: General

Time To Report Evidence

The claimant is obliged to declare with the evidence that he will prove the facts with which he claims. The plaintiff should submit the documents at hand to the petition and provide information on where to bring the documents. (HMK art. 140/5.) If the subsequent assertion of an evidence does not aim to delay the proceedings or if it is not due to the fault of the party concerned, the court may allow the subsequent evidence to be shown. (YHGK, 20.04.2016, E. 2014 / 13-856, K. 2016/523 numbered decision) There is no possibility for the plaintiff who has not given any evidence in the exchange stage of the petition to be given new time in the preliminary hearing to give evidence.

The decision of the Supreme Court is as follows.

2. Legal Department 2015/19509 E., 2016/12319 K.

THE COURT: The Family Court
CASE TYPE: Divorce

At the end of the reasoning of the case between the parties given the court of the local court, the number of the date and number shown by the defendant woman appealed, the documents were read and considered as necessary:
The claimant is obliged to declare with the evidence that he will prove the facts with which he claims. The plaintiff should submit the documents at hand to the petition and provide information on where to bring the documents. (HMK art. 140/5.) If the subsequent assertion of an evidence does not aim to delay the proceedings or if it is not due to the fault of the party concerned, the court may allow the subsequent evidence to be shown. (YHGK, 20.04.2016, E. 2014 / 13-856, K. 2016/523 numbered decision) There is no possibility for the plaintiff who has not given any evidence in the exchange stage of the petition to be given new time in the preliminary hearing to give evidence. The plaintiff was not based on witness evidence in his male case-law. In the preliminary examination hearing on 11.11.2014, it was not true that the plaintiff had been given 2 weeks for the court to inform the court of the witnesses.
CONCLUSION: The reason given for the reason shown above, the reason for the reason of the appeal of appeal for the appeal of the objections of appeal for the present is not yet to be returned to the investor in return, 15 days from the notification of this decision, the decision was made by unanimous decision to be clear.

Aşıkoğlu Law Office

Recent Posts

A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE WORKPLACE INSURANCE POLICY, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE

17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE AND DECISION

ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…

2 years ago

DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HMK

ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…

2 years ago

CHILDREN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DEPRIVATION OF SUPPORT DUE TO PARENTS

SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…

2 years ago

COUNCIL OF STATE DECISION ON EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE

11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…

2 years ago

COMPENSATION LAWSUIT FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EARTHQUAKE

17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago