If it is alleged that the executive director acted contrary to the provisions of the follow-up law when editing the order table and the treatment was not appropriate to the transaction, a complaint is filed against the order table. (IIK m.16)

IIK M.142,IIK m due to all situations in which the executive director is obliged to comply and make a re’sen, even if it is considered that the path of complaint against the order table from III is only relevant in the form of an appeal against the order table. 16 the complaint method can be resorted to as required. The first of the reasons for the complaint will be that the creditor will not be accepted in the order he wants.

If one of the creditors wants to appeal to the order tableon the order table for his own order or to the order table of other creditors, he must report this to the executive court through a complaint.

It should be noted that it is accepted that a complaint can also be filed if the bailiff acts contrary to the provisions of the follow-up law when issuing the order table schedule.

The supreme court has established by various case law “which complaint is an appeal to the order and which must be filed with the executive court”. For example:

” The plaintiff o the order of distraint of disputes would be resolved by the enforcement of the court about whether or not included in, the basis and amount of a receivable, as well as the degree of the ruler in the order given and, therefore, the enforcement portion of the sale price of the conflict would be resolved in the court that is incorrect, and is not the basis for the quantity you take, but the court of appeals against the order alone would be resolved in the enforcement ” of the complaint has been clarified by stating in the way