INFORMATION

THE HEIRS CLAIM THAT THE DECEASED SPOUSE WILL RECEIVE A PARTICIPATION

This case is considered between the surviving spouse and the heirs of the other spouse and gives the right of Deciency. Even if it is not well known in practice, the surviving spouse can file this case against the other legal heirs of the deceased spouse, as well as the right to claim that he will receive participation is possible for the heirs of the deceased spouse. However, the right of heirs to claim is not unlimited and indefinite. Heirs must submit their claims for participation to the surviving spouse within a 10-year period.

Otherwise, the right of claim will expire, and the heirs will not be able to make any requests from the surviving spouse. If the 10-year period with a statute of limitations has not expired even after the inheritance has been shared, the surviving spouse may file a claim for participation against the heirs or the surviving spouse for the right of the heir.

After the liquidation of the regime of participation in the acquired property, the liquidation of the inheritance proceeds. He is involved in the liquidation of the inheritance together with the surviving co-heirs. In this case, twice for the surviving spouse, material protection is provided, first in the liquidation of the regime of participation in the acquired property, and then in the liquidation of the estate. If the surviving spouse has a right to participate, this is also the debt of the deceased’s landowner.

After removing this participation from the dead spouse’s dress code, the deceased spouse’s net dress code is obtained. If the surviving spouse is the heir along with the other group over this amount, he receives the right to inherit at the appropriate rate for him. In this respect, it can be said that the surviving spouse will receive a participation that actually affects by reducing the term, but will receive one independent of the term.

You can reach our other articles, sample decisions and petitions by clicking here

Yağız Canseven

Recent Posts

A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE WORKPLACE INSURANCE POLICY, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE

17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

1 year ago

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE AND DECISION

ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…

1 year ago

DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HMK

ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…

1 year ago

CHILDREN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DEPRIVATION OF SUPPORT DUE TO PARENTS

SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…

1 year ago

COUNCIL OF STATE DECISION ON EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE

11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…

1 year ago

COMPENSATION LAWSUIT FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EARTHQUAKE

17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

1 year ago