Categories: INFORMATION

THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL

T.C SUPREME COURT 13.Legal Department Base: 2015/ 41840 Decision: 2015 / 38474 Decision Date: 31.12.2015

The Decision of the Supreme Court

COURT OF First Instance: Court of First Instance

decision

The case concerns a dispute arising out of insurance law.

04.12.2014 day and Article 27 of the Law No. 6572 on Amendments to the Law on Judges and Prosecutors and Some Laws and Legislative Decrees.article 14 of the Supreme Court Law No. 2797.according to the amendment made to the article; In accordance with the decision of the First Presidential Council of the Supreme Court dated 19.01.2015 and numbered 2015/8, there are cases of receivables arising from insurance law, as well as IIK 67. based on the article

revocation of the objection and Article 72 of the IIK. the duty of examining the judgments and decisions issued as a result of the cases of determining that the debtor is not caused by the article by appeal is as of 01.02.2015 The Court of Cassation 11.It was given to the Law Department.

2 of the Law No. 6644 on Amending the Supreme Court Law and the Code of Civil Procedure.article 60 of the Supreme Court Law No. 2797.according to the amendment made to the article and published in the Official Gazette dated 11.04.2015 and entered into force, the file was sent to the relevant legal department for an appeal review by the court, if he does not consider himself an official in terms of the division of labor as a result of the preliminary examination that he will conduct within a month, he should send the file to the Legal Division of Labor Review Board together with the reason, so it was necessary to decide that the case file should be sent to the Supreme Court Legal Division of Labor Review Board to determine the office in charge.

CONCLUSION: It was unanimously decided on 31/12/2015 that the case file should be SENT to the Supreme Court Legal Division of Labor Review Board to determine the office in charge.

Yağız Canseven

Recent Posts

A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE WORKPLACE INSURANCE POLICY, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE

17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE AND DECISION

ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…

2 years ago

DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HMK

ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…

2 years ago

CHILDREN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DEPRIVATION OF SUPPORT DUE TO PARENTS

SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…

2 years ago

COUNCIL OF STATE DECISION ON EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE

11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…

2 years ago

COMPENSATION LAWSUIT FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EARTHQUAKE

17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago