THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
20126
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-20126,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL

24 Dec THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL

Posted at 00:36h in INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 13.Legal Department Base: 2015/ 41840 Decision: 2015 / 38474 Decision Date: 31.12.2015

The Decision of the Supreme Court

COURT OF First Instance: Court of First Instance

decision

The case concerns a dispute arising out of insurance law.

04.12.2014 day and Article 27 of the Law No. 6572 on Amendments to the Law on Judges and Prosecutors and Some Laws and Legislative Decrees.article 14 of the Supreme Court Law No. 2797.according to the amendment made to the article; In accordance with the decision of the First Presidential Council of the Supreme Court dated 19.01.2015 and numbered 2015/8, there are cases of receivables arising from insurance law, as well as IIK 67. based on the article

revocation of the objection and Article 72 of the IIK. the duty of examining the judgments and decisions issued as a result of the cases of determining that the debtor is not caused by the article by appeal is as of 01.02.2015 The Court of Cassation 11.It was given to the Law Department.

2 of the Law No. 6644 on Amending the Supreme Court Law and the Code of Civil Procedure.article 60 of the Supreme Court Law No. 2797.according to the amendment made to the article and published in the Official Gazette dated 11.04.2015 and entered into force, the file was sent to the relevant legal department for an appeal review by the court, if he does not consider himself an official in terms of the division of labor as a result of the preliminary examination that he will conduct within a month, he should send the file to the Legal Division of Labor Review Board together with the reason, so it was necessary to decide that the case file should be sent to the Supreme Court Legal Division of Labor Review Board to determine the office in charge.

CONCLUSION: It was unanimously decided on 31/12/2015 that the case file should be SENT to the Supreme Court Legal Division of Labor Review Board to determine the office in charge.

Tags:
, , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran