THE CASE OF TROVER AND ITS CONSEQUENCES - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
20544
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-20544,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

THE CASE OF TROVER AND ITS CONSEQUENCES

THE CASE OF TROVER AND ITS CONSEQUENCES

The court in charge of the trover case is the First Instance Law Courts. The competent court, on the other hand, is the court of the defendant’s place of residence or the court of the place where the enforcement proceedings are conducted.

If the case is won by the plaintiff in the trovercase, not only the money paid to the creditor by enforcement proceedings, but also the enforcement fees and expenses that he has to pay, the defendant has the right to receive from the creditor.

It should be noted that if the payment is made regardless of the fact that the debt has expired, an trover case cannot be filed for the return of the money paid by the borrower.

On the other hand, if the plaintiff loses the case, the defendant will have to pay the creditor the costs of the trial related to the case.

In the cases explained, it is also out of the question that the party who lost the case will be sentenced to pay 40% compensation.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran