If the creditor who has an objection to the order table does not claim that the transaction has been incorrectly applied not only to the rules of follow-up law, but also to the creditor who has been placed on the order table, or objects to his order, he must apply for an appeal in the general courts against the order table, in short, sue that creditor. Here, the plaintiff is the creditor who objects to the receivable or order of the creditor who has been placed on the order table. The defendant, on the other hand, is in the position of objecting to the receivables or order. If the debtor is able to file a complaint against the order manager, he has no right to file an appeal against the order manager.

The supreme court has stated in some of its dog tags that ”which objections are related to the basis and amount of the receivable” are objections and therefore should be notified to the general court in the form of an appeal case to the order table. For example:

” If the plaintiff has objected to the amount of his/her receivable, the dispute will have to be resolved in the general court, the claim that the receivable recorded in the order table will have to be removed from there due to the fact that it has expired will be examined in the general court, the claim that the creditor’s receivable in the order table should be removed from the order table will be examined in the general court,” he/she emphasizes. If no complaint or objection is made to the qorder table within 7 days, the order table is finalized and the rights to lawsuits and complaints are lost.