mahmutlar

AN EXAMPLE OF A RESIGNATION PETITION

TO THE ... COURT/PRESIDENCY file number : Plaintiff: TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : attorney : address : DEFENDANT : TC IDENTIFICATION…

3 years ago

An Example of a Petition Requesting Payment of an Attorney’s Fee

TO THE .. COURT PLAINTIFF: TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : address : attorney : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any)…

3 years ago

EXAMPLE OF A DISCHARGE

TO THE .. NOTARY NAME AND SURNAME OF THE ASSIGNEE : ADDRESS : THE DISMISSED : ADDRESS OF THE DISMISSED…

3 years ago

PAYMENT OF RENT-NOTICE EXAMPLE

TO THE ... NOTARY denegation WHO WARNS : attorney : address : WHO HAS BEEN WARNED : ADDRESS : SUBJECT…

3 years ago

FIELD LEASE AGREEMENT

owner : Address : Tenant : Address : Rented Space : Your Rented Place Features : The Beginning of Rent…

3 years ago

FIRST OF ALL, THE COURT SHOULD EXAMINE AND EVALUATE ALL THE REASONS FOR THE DISMISSAL THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE REPORTED, INCLUDING THE TRIAL STAGE, AND MAKE A DECISION BASED ON THE RESULT

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/7350 Decision: 2015/31650 Date of Decision: 03.11.2015 CASE OF RECEIVABLES…

3 years ago

THE COURT’S DECISION THAT THE REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE RELATED TO THE FILE OF THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE IS CONTRARY TO THE PROCEDURE AND THE LAW DUE TO THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT WITNESS, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/2853 Decision: 2016/7239 Date of Decision: 08.03.2016 CASE OF RECEIVABLES…

3 years ago

THE DECISION ON WHETHER TO OBTAIN A DETAILED EXPERT REPORT BASED ON THE AUDIT OF THE PARTIES AND THE JUDICIARY IN TERMS OF THE PARTIES’ REQUESTS IN ORDER TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARTIES ARE CREDITORS OF EACH OTHER BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS PERIOD AND THE CONTRACTUAL PERIOD

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/37944 Decision: 2015/34696 Date of Decision: 30.11.2015 THE CASE OF…

3 years ago

THE DECISION IS BASED ON THE EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE DECISION IS BASED AND THERE IS NO INACCURACY IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE – THE DECISION THAT THE APPEALS ARE NOT IN PLACE

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 16.law office Base: 2015/5675 Decision: 2015/13516 Date of Decision: 17.11.2015 CASE OF CANCELLATION…

3 years ago

REQUEST FOR ANIMAL FORECLOSURE

TO THE T.C ... EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE FILE NO : .../ ... E. DEBT : INSTRUCTIONS Specified above, the borrower name…

3 years ago
Show more Posts
Show previous Posts