antalya

INTERESTING PROHIBITIONS THAT ARE AGAINST THE LAW IN SINGAPORE

Singapore is known for having strict regulations and laws, let's take a look at a few of them together. The…

3 years ago

AN EXAMPLE OF A COMPLAINT PETITION

TO THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE THE COMPLAINANT : First and Last Name (T.C. ID No.) Address SUSPECT : His Name,…

3 years ago

THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CRIME OF VIOLATING THE PRIVACY OF PRIVATE LIFE

T.C.( Republic of Turkey) SUPREME COURT 12. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT Base: 2019/3962 Decision: 2020/5421 T. 21.10.2020 * The crime of breach…

3 years ago

LAW AND MYTHOLOGY IN ANCIENT GREECE

Ancient Greece is among the most deciphered early civilizations in terms of terms or laws and social regulations. Unlike the…

3 years ago

THE PETITIONS WRITTEN BY THE LAWYER CANNOT BE CONSIDERED AS WORK OF ART

Supreme Court 11. law office Base Number: 2015/12923 Decision Number: 2017/2724 “text of jurisprudence” COURT : ... ... 1. INTELLECTUAL…

3 years ago

THE RIGHT TO REQUEST INTEREST MAY BE REQUESTED AT ANY TIME WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT

General Assembly of Law Base Number: 2017/1704 Decision Number: 2020/534 Court of First Instance: Court of First Instance “text of…

3 years ago

THE PROVISION IS INVALID IF THE PROHIBITION OF COMPETITION DOES NOT CONTAIN FAIR RESTRICTIONS THAT ENDANGER THE ECONOMIC FUTURE OF THE EMPLOYEE

Supreme Court 11. Civil Department Base Number: 2017/3251 Decision Number: 2019/805 “text of jurisprudence” COURT : ... DISTRICT COURT OF…

3 years ago

USING A DIPLOMA THAT THE EMPLOYEE KNOWS IT IS FAKE IS A JUSTIFIED TERMINATION OF THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

9. Civil Department Base Number: 2010/22804 E Decision Number: 2012/32150 “text of jurisprudence” COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (BUSINESS) COURT CASE…

3 years ago

THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT OF A WORKER WHO PLAYS DECENTLY IN COFFEE DURING THE BREAK PERIOD CANNOT BE TERMINATED VALIDLY

9. Civil Department Base Number: 2015/22089 Decision Number: 2015/29606 “text of jurisprudence” COURT :LABOUR COURT CASE : The plaintiff requested…

3 years ago

THE CONSUMER COURT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CASE TO BE FILED AGAINST THE SERVICE THAT PROVIDES THE EXPERTISE REPORT

General Assembly of Law Base Number: 2013/1203 Decision Number: 2014/442 “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Ankara 10. Court of First…

3 years ago