T.C. SUPREME 17. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/13365 DECISION NO: 2016/6633 DECISION DATE: 3.5.2016 WHETHER LAWYERS CAN TESTIFY AGAINST THEIR…
T.C. SUPREME 4. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/5240 DECISION NO: 2018/1873 DECISION DATE: 14.3.2018 > > ASSAULT ON PERSONAL RIGHTS…
T.O SUPREME 19. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2018/3074 DECISION NO: 2018/4708 DECISION DATE: 18.04.2018 > > REQUEST FOR SETTLEMENT OF…
T.O SUPREME 11.LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/9590 RESOLUTION NO: 2513 DECISION DATE: 09.04.2018 > THE PENSION CANNOT BE BLOCKED DUE…
T.C. SUPREME GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/22-1608 DECISION NO: 2018/448 DECISION DATE: 7.3.2018 >RETURN OF MILITARY SERVICE 18…
Supreme Court 13. Legal Department PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/16613 DECISION NO: 2017/2063 At the end of the trial of the claim…
In order to uncover the material truth in the criminal trial, it is investigated whether the elements of the crime…
The parties, parties and the case license to have the conditions of the case (HMK m. 114/1-d) which relates to…
Although the existence of the right is necessary and sufficient in the relations between the parties, it is necessary to…
The case for elimination of partnership is a bilateral (actioduplex) case. Both parties will benefit from the decision to be…