T.O
SUPREME
2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16665
DECISION NO: 2018/5562
DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018
Court: Family Court
Case type: divorce

THE WOMAN WHO IS WORKING AND HAS A PERMANENT INCOME IS NOT ENTITLED TO ALIMONY.

At the end of the judgment of the case between the parties given by the Local Court, the verdict shown above the date and number of the defendant by the male defect determination, alimony and reparations in terms of appeal, the document is read and discussed as required
considered:

1-according to the writings in the file, the evidence on which the decision is based and the reasons in accordance with the law, and in particular, there is no mistrust in the appreciation of the evidence, the appeals of the defendant which are outside the scope of the following paragraph are irrelevant.

2-from the evidence collected, it is understood that the woman worked, had regular and continuous income. Women’s benefit TMK m. 175 conditions have not occurred. While it was necessary to decide on the rejection of the plaintiff woman’s claim for poverty support, it was not right to decide on her acceptance in writing and it was necessary to quash it.

Result: 2 above the appealed provision. the above sections are subject to appeal, which are outside the scope of corruption. it was unanimously decided that the appeal should be approved for the reason shown in the paragraph, that the cash fee should be returned to the Depositor upon request, and that within 15 days of the notification of this decision, the way of Correction of the decision should be clear. 25.04.2018