MINISTRY OF JUSTICE GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF LEGAL AFFAIRS

CLAIM HOLDER :

Deputy :

Subject: … court … / … E. and … / … K. it is a request to go down the path of breaking the law in respect of its numbered decision.

INSTRUCTIONS :

1 -) upon our objection to the enforcement proceedings against the claim that the debt for the services provided in accordance with the individual membership agreement held between the client and the plaintiff company in the case given above was not paid, the plaintiff’s request was partially accepted and partially rejected in the trial for the cancellation of the appeal. Since the decision in question is not one of the decisions subject to appeal, the decision was finalized without an appeal review.

2 -) HMUK. 1 of Article 417. paragraph 2. his sentence stipulates that” if each of the two parties in the case is partially justified, the court will charge each of them with the expense or distribute this expense between them at its discretion.” Accordingly, the allocation of court costs in accordance with the amount of the case accepted and rejected, that is, the amounts to which the parties are justified, in favor of the defendant, who represents himself through a proxy in the trial over the rejected part of the HMUK. 423. Article 1. paragraph 6. according to me, the power of attorney fee, which is calculated from court costs, must be ruled. Considering that part of the case was rejected by the court, it is against the procedure and the law that the attorney’s fee should not be imposed in accordance with the minimum wage tariff for the benefit of the defendant, who represents him through a lawyer. In order to ensure that this violation is resolved, it is necessary to apply to your office to operate a path of violation for the benefit of the law.

Legal reasons: 1086 P. K. m. 417, 423, 427 and related legislation.

Conclusion and request : for the reasons described above, we respectfully supply and demand on behalf of the client that the way to disrupt the law is operated by your authority in order to disrupt the decision of the Local Court. …/…/…

Prompt The Owner Attorney

Lawyer