PETITION FOR APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION OF LACK OF COMPTENCE - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
20110
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-20110,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

PETITION FOR APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION OF LACK OF COMPTENCE

22 Dec PETITION FOR APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION OF LACK OF COMPTENCE

Posted at 00:24h in petition by
0 Likes

TO THE JUDICATURE OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

FILE NO : …/ … E.

DEFENDANT :

THE DEFENDER :

CRIME : A Crime of Information Theft.

SUBJECT : It consists of our appeal against the decision to dismiss.

INSTRUCTIONS :

1-) …/ …/ … in the history of paying that money belongs to the bank branch, waiting in front of the machine, previously taking money from the complainant card into the machine by compressing … …’s password under the pretext of helping the complainant’s debit card to make a jam after learning the complainant, by convincing you to leave after his departure, cut away the money from the complainant’s account and use the card for £ Informatics for the crime of theft of our client about attracting your court …/ … E. a public lawsuit has been filed with file No.

2-) At the trial held by your court …/ …/ … it was found that the breakthrough constituted a qualified fraud crime, not information theft, and the file was sent to the Heavy Criminal Court … which is considered to be in charge by issuing a decision of dismissal.

3-) The General Assembly of the Criminal Court of the Supreme Court, issued on 26.02.2008 and 2008/11-17 E in a similar incident. 2008/38 K. with its numbered decision; It has resolved the duty dispute between the Criminal Court of First Instance and the Criminal Court of Heavy Punishment by removing the decision of decommissioning of the Criminal Court of First Instance.

4-) Taking into account the case law provision found above; It has been necessary to apply to your court for the acceptance of our appeal against the decision of non-duty issued by your court and to proceed to the examination of the merits of the work.

LEGAL REASONS : 5237 P. K. m. 142, 158, 5271 Pp. K. m. 5, 267, 268

CONCLUSION AND REQUEST: For the reasons we have explained above, the lawsuit filed in your court about our client …/ … E. we respectfully request on behalf of our client that the decision to dismiss the decision made in the numbered file be decided on the merits of the job with the acceptance of our appeal. …/ …/ …

Defense of the Accused

Tags:
, , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran