T.C.
SUPREME
11. Penalty Department
E. 2008/21718
K. T. 2011/21383 2.11.2011
Case: dossier reviewed and deemed necessary:

Verdict: allegedly used by the company of which the accused is an official and arranged as a fake, and has a tax Technical Report about ” … INS. Renown. Tic. Co. If it is determined that a lawsuit has been filed against the company”, it has been brought and examined, certified samples of the evidence related to this case are provided to the file, dispatch and transport Dispatch notes indicating the flow of goods and money in order to determine whether the invoices are the actual exchange equivalent, the cost of goods delivery documents and the invoice has been paid current with the content of the payment documents presented by the defendant and caused by the presence of current by examining the receipts of the payment documents also, although it is accepted the existence of the vault or it is determined that the seller’s price to the bank account entered on the defendant’s property taxpayer receiving sufficient production, goods receipt or stock is also taken into consideration whether it is done after evaluating all the evidence collected and a comparative examination of the defendant’s discretion and the determination of legal status while you should, sentencing facility in writing based on the expert report organized as a result of the examination conducted through the file,

Conclusion: contrary to the law, since the appeals of the participating deputy were considered in place for this reason, the provision must be applied in accordance with article 8/1 of law 5320 No. 1412 C.M.U.It was unanimously decided on 02.11.2011 that K should be violated as a claim in accordance with article 321, and that the appeal should be returned if requested.