Summary:

£ 1,500 given directly. 8/1 of Law No. 5320, due to the fact that its decision on the judicial fine was of definite quality in terms of quantity. sending the article is still in force in accordance with Article 305/last article of Cmuk No. 1412 can not be taken into consideration the basis of repetition,

T.C.
Supreme
3. Criminal Department

Principal No: 2014/36032
Decision No: 2015/12450
K. Date: 8.4.2015

The sentence given by the Local Court is appealed and the paperwork is read;
Need to be discussed and considered;
Rejection of other appellate appeals, however;
Karadeniz Ereğli 1. E. Of The Criminal Court Of First Instance2010/402-K. 1.500 TL issued directly with the decree no.2012/148. 8/1 of Law No. 5320, due to the fact that its decision on the judicial fine was of definite quality in terms of quantity. sending the article is still in force in accordance with Article 305/last article of Cmuk No. 1412 can not be taken into consideration the basis of repetition,
Because the appeal appeals of the accused were thus deemed in place, the provision was therefore amended 8/1 of Law No. 5320. article 321 of the Cmuk No. 1412 in force. in accordance with the article, it was decided unanimously on 08/04/2015 that the request should be impaired.