Categories: General

Exclude From The Partnership Based On The Right Reason

Withdrawal From The Partnership Based On A Justified Reason
Another way to remove a partner from a partnership in Limited liability companies is to remove the partner from the partnership based on a justified reason.In other words, since it is not necessary to specify in the articles of Association of the limited liability company which conditions will be the reason for withdrawal from the partnership, the limited liability for withdrawal from the partnership
even if there is no provision in the companiesas contract,limited liability companies can always sue their partners with a request to withdraw them from the partnership based on the right reason. Before the court application by the limited company for withdrawal from the partnership for a justified reason, the limited company
in this context, the General Assembly must take a decision of the General Assembly. The decision of the General Assembly in question is among the important decisions due to the fact that it is among the inalienable powers of the General Assembly from the point of view of limited liability companies. Therefore, the quorum required for the decision of the relevant General Assembly shall be held at the General Assembly.
it is a combination of at least two-thirds of the represented votes and an absolute majority of the entire voting capital.
The Turkish Commercial Code tried to draw the boundaries of the right cause with Article 245. Accordingly, the fact that a partner has betrayed the partnership in the management of the partnership or in the extraction of its accounts, has not fulfilled the main duties and debts that fall to it, is the trade title of the company for the sake of the partner’s personal interests
or abuse of property, a constant illness that he has suffered, or the fact that the partner he has taken on for some other reason has lost the ability and driver’s license necessary to do their job are the main cases of justifiable reasons that are not considered limited.

Aşıkoğlu Law Office

Recent Posts

A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION UNDER THE WORKPLACE INSURANCE POLICY, WHICH ALSO INCLUDES EARTHQUAKE COVERAGE

17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE AND DECISION

ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…

2 years ago

DETERMINATION OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF HMK

ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…

2 years ago

CHILDREN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR DEPRIVATION OF SUPPORT DUE TO PARENTS

SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…

2 years ago

COUNCIL OF STATE DECISION ON EARTHQUAKE INSURANCE

11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…

2 years ago

COMPENSATION LAWSUIT FOR DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE EARTHQUAKE

17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…

2 years ago