DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS – THE EXPIRATION OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
20905
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-20905,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS – THE EXPIRATION OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD

DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS – THE EXPIRATION OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD

TO THE … FAMILY COURT
Plaintiff : A… (husband or wife)
Defendant : B… (husband or wife)
Subject : The request to issue a divorce decision in accordance with the article of the TMK … due to the fact that 3 years have passed since the decision to reject the filed divorce case was finalized.
Legal Evidence: Population records, the main divorce case file and the rejection decision in the file, Witnesses, Financial and social status research and all kinds of other legal evidence.
Legal Reason: TMK and all kinds of related legislation
Instructions :
1. Our plaintiff client, the defendant is with his wife B… There have been no children from these marriages (there have been).
2. Although the parties have tried to keep their marriage afloat since they were married, they have not been successful in this and ……….in the history of the plaintiff our client is about the defendant because of the shaking of the foundation of the marriage union …./…. he filed for divorce on the basis of the principal number. But about the case in question ……..By the tribunal ……day ./……. the decision to reject was made in the decision numbered.
3. Decision of refusal……….it was finalized on the day it was finalized and more than three years have passed since the day it was finalized. The parties have not been able to maintain a common life during this time. For this reason, the opening of this case has become mandatory.
4. It’s TMK’s…. in accordance with the article, we request that my evidence be collected and a divorce decision be made.
Conclusion and Request: As we explained above, from the day the rejection decision of the filed divorce case no…….was finalized, the parties could not meet with the defendant to continue dec common life and the marriage union could not be continued. Due to the fact that more than three years have passed since the day of finalization of the refusal decision, I sincerely offer and request that the parties be decided to DIVORCE and receive the costs from the defendant in accordance with the provisions of the TMK.

Plaintiff A… (spouse)

 

You can read other petitions and articles by clicking here.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran