Our bankruptcy law of our household goods to 82/3. limitation. According to the Regulation ev except for precious things such as money, negotiable documents, gold, silver, precious stones, antiques or ornaments; if the item used for the same purpose is more than one, one of them may be ın handed over.
According to the law, in the debtor’s house money, negotiable documents (stocks, bills, checks etc.), gold, silver, precious stones, antique or ornamental items are possible. There is no limitation except for the amount of the debt required to be seized.
In the Supreme Court’s decisions; It is defined as all kinds of goods necessary to sustain the life of the borrower, to maintain a modest standard of living and maintain the minimum conditions of the social status. According to the Court of Appeals, households who are obliged for the family members who live under the same roof and who are hayat required insan for refrigerator, washing machine, television, sofa set, iron, oven, carpet, dishwasher, etc. are not subject to foreclosure. . (Supreme Court 12th H.D. 2012/27279 E. 2013/11536 26.03.2013)
Household goods need to be needed for family members living under the same roof as the debtor and the debtor. The concept of family members living under the same roof includes the spouse’s wife, children, sonship, debtors who live with the debtor or relatives of the spouse.
If there is more than one of the necessary household items, one of them should not be confiscated and left to the debtor. It is possible to confiscate other household goods / belongings. The Court of Cassation decides which household goods should be seized and which household goods are not to be confiscated; (12th Law Department of the Supreme Court 2013/34641 2014/889 16.01.2014)
The value of the needful household goods will not constitute an obstacle for the complaint of imprisonment. However, if the value of the necessary household goods is very exorbitant, the Supreme Court shall decide not to hear the complaint of imprisonment.
In case of the seizure of the aforementioned necessity, the execution court can be complained against the decision of the executive director who places the order. The duration of the complaint is 7 days as from the day of the learned process (subject to the need for the necessary household goods). If the court is satisfied with the complaint, the enforcement court removes the confiscation on the goods, and the goods are returned to the debtor.
The subject matter described above relates to the borrower and the goods which are required for those living under the same roof. There are other topics that are prohibited. It is recommended that those who wish to obtain detailed information about the non-fraudulent complaint should apply to the lawyer.
17. Law Office 2018/1547 E. , 2018/12611 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…
ARTICLE 402 OF THE CCP (1) The request for the determination of evidence shall be…
ARTICLE 400 OF THE Civil Procedure Code (1) Each of the Parties may request that…
SUPPORT OF PARENTS TO THEIR CHILDREN 1- GENERAL RULE According to the decisions of the…
11. Apartment 2001/2549 E. , 2005/183 K . “text of jurisprudence” T.C. COUNCIL OF STATE…
17. Law Office 2016/11461 E. , 2019/7615 K. “text of jurisprudence” COURT : Court of…